<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1044 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352775</link>
    <description>Where a company had not carried on mining operations for several years and merely let out machinery on a long-term basis to a sister concern, the lease receipts were treated as a separate source of income and assessed as income from other sources, not as business income. The reported lease rent mismatch between the return and Form 26AS/TDS figures was also not reconciled, so the higher figure was upheld. On the related claims for dead rent, environment expenses, and salary and wages, the genuineness and business necessity of the expenditure had not been properly verified, so the matter was remitted for verification rather than finally disallowed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1044 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352775</link>
      <description>Where a company had not carried on mining operations for several years and merely let out machinery on a long-term basis to a sister concern, the lease receipts were treated as a separate source of income and assessed as income from other sources, not as business income. The reported lease rent mismatch between the return and Form 26AS/TDS figures was also not reconciled, so the higher figure was upheld. On the related claims for dead rent, environment expenses, and salary and wages, the genuineness and business necessity of the expenditure had not been properly verified, so the matter was remitted for verification rather than finally disallowed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>