<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1040 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352771</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs invoking Regulation 23 to prohibit a Customs Broker&#039;s operations due to serious violations of Regulations 11 and 17. The Court emphasized the need for immediate action to prevent illegal activities, highlighting the availability of appeal to CESTAT for the petitioner. It stressed the importance of utilizing appellate processes to address grievances related to natural justice and regulatory breaches, rather than seeking immediate intervention through writ jurisdiction. The Court emphasized the balance between natural justice and preventing tax evasion, dismissing the writ petition to allow investigative and appellate processes to address regulatory breaches effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1040 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352771</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs invoking Regulation 23 to prohibit a Customs Broker&#039;s operations due to serious violations of Regulations 11 and 17. The Court emphasized the need for immediate action to prevent illegal activities, highlighting the availability of appeal to CESTAT for the petitioner. It stressed the importance of utilizing appellate processes to address grievances related to natural justice and regulatory breaches, rather than seeking immediate intervention through writ jurisdiction. The Court emphasized the balance between natural justice and preventing tax evasion, dismissing the writ petition to allow investigative and appellate processes to address regulatory breaches effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>