<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1033 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352764</link>
    <description>Bail was refused where the charge-sheet and investigation material suggested prima facie involvement in a conspiracy to receive and park bribe money. The Court noted that the petitioner was not a public servant but was alleged to have acted as a link between the main accused and other beneficiaries. Regular contact with the main accused, recovery of substantial cash and gold from that accused, alleged parking of ill-gotten money with the petitioner, and call detail evidence were treated as sufficient to indicate participation in the alleged offence. Filing of the charge-sheet did not outweigh this material, and the prayer for release was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:17:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1033 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352764</link>
      <description>Bail was refused where the charge-sheet and investigation material suggested prima facie involvement in a conspiracy to receive and park bribe money. The Court noted that the petitioner was not a public servant but was alleged to have acted as a link between the main accused and other beneficiaries. Regular contact with the main accused, recovery of substantial cash and gold from that accused, alleged parking of ill-gotten money with the petitioner, and call detail evidence were treated as sufficient to indicate participation in the alleged offence. Filing of the charge-sheet did not outweigh this material, and the prayer for release was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>