<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1011 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal adjusted the estimated values of properties downwards in the Assessee&#039;s favor due to lack of evidence provided. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, emphasizing adherence to such limits. The decision highlights the significance of substantiating property valuations with concrete evidence and complying with specified tax effect thresholds for appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1011 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal adjusted the estimated values of properties downwards in the Assessee&#039;s favor due to lack of evidence provided. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, emphasizing adherence to such limits. The decision highlights the significance of substantiating property valuations with concrete evidence and complying with specified tax effect thresholds for appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>