https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196998 The Court condoned a 763-day delay in filing the appeal due to the illness of the individual handling the papers. The appeal challenged the denial of service tax exemption for "vocational training" under Notification No. 9/2003-S.T., with the Court affirming that the training provided qualified as such. Relying on precedent cases, the Court emphasized that vocational training aimed at imparting skills for employment or self-employment meets the exemption criteria. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial legal questions. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:15:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196998 The Court condoned a 763-day delay in filing the appeal due to the illness of the individual handling the papers. The appeal challenged the denial of service tax exemption for "vocational training" under Notification No. 9/2003-S.T., with the Court affirming that the training provided qualified as such. Relying on precedent cases, the Court emphasized that vocational training aimed at imparting skills for employment or self-employment meets the exemption criteria. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial legal questions. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196998