<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1291 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196999</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement. It found in favor of the respondent, setting aside the shareholding in favor of the 4th appellant due to lack of notice before allotment. The Tribunal also directed the refund of the amount provided by the 4th appellant with interest within one month. The appeal was disposed of with these rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 08:15:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1291 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196999</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower court&#039;s decision in a case involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement. It found in favor of the respondent, setting aside the shareholding in favor of the 4th appellant due to lack of notice before allotment. The Tribunal also directed the refund of the amount provided by the 4th appellant with interest within one month. The appeal was disposed of with these rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>