<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1228 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196995</link>
    <description>Arbitration is ordinarily subject to minimal judicial intervention, with the tribunal deciding its own jurisdiction, but that restraint is not absolute. The court recognised an exceptional basis to intervene where the dispute is inseparably tied to allegations of serious fraud, engages public policy concerns, and directly affects the rights of a necessary third party not before the tribunal. On those facts, the facilitation arrangement and related media-rights controversy were treated as unsuitable for exclusive confidential arbitration, and restraint of the arbitral proceedings was considered justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 18:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1228 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196995</link>
      <description>Arbitration is ordinarily subject to minimal judicial intervention, with the tribunal deciding its own jurisdiction, but that restraint is not absolute. The court recognised an exceptional basis to intervene where the dispute is inseparably tied to allegations of serious fraud, engages public policy concerns, and directly affects the rights of a necessary third party not before the tribunal. On those facts, the facilitation arrangement and related media-rights controversy were treated as unsuitable for exclusive confidential arbitration, and restraint of the arbitral proceedings was considered justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>