https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196991 The arbitration framework limits civil court intervention, but a court may still examine whether the plaintiff is personally bound by an arbitration agreement when its existence, operability, or enforceability is specifically disputed. In international commercial arbitration, the court must itself take a prima facie view on whether a valid arbitration agreement exists against the objecting party before referring the matter. A non-party cannot be compelled to arbitrate merely because of related contracts or entities. The presence of additional non-arbitral parties does not defeat arbitration between parties bound by an arbitration clause where the claims are separable. Orders effectively made under Section 45 are subject to the Act's statutory limits on appeal. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196991 The arbitration framework limits civil court intervention, but a court may still examine whether the plaintiff is personally bound by an arbitration agreement when its existence, operability, or enforceability is specifically disputed. In international commercial arbitration, the court must itself take a prima facie view on whether a valid arbitration agreement exists against the objecting party before referring the matter. A non-party cannot be compelled to arbitrate merely because of related contracts or entities. The presence of additional non-arbitral parties does not defeat arbitration between parties bound by an arbitration clause where the claims are separable. Orders effectively made under Section 45 are subject to the Act's statutory limits on appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196991