https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196981 The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's decision in favor of the respondents, awarding them a sum of money, interest, and compensation for pain and suffering due to the developers' deficiency in service. The Court ruled that the claim petition was not time-barred as there was a continuing cause of action from the original agreement, rejecting the argument that a new agreement substituted the original contract. The respondents were justified in claiming specific performance of the original agreement, and the Commission's decree was upheld, dismissing the appeal. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jul 2026 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196981 The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's decision in favor of the respondents, awarding them a sum of money, interest, and compensation for pain and suffering due to the developers' deficiency in service. The Court ruled that the claim petition was not time-barred as there was a continuing cause of action from the original agreement, rejecting the argument that a new agreement substituted the original contract. The respondents were justified in claiming specific performance of the original agreement, and the Commission's decree was upheld, dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196981