https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196979 Unexplained delay in forwarding a detenu's representation can breach Article 22(5) where the jail authority fails to transmit it promptly; the original detention order remains valid, but continued detention becomes illegal. The text also notes that independent consideration by the detaining authority was not disproved on the materials, because the representation was processed through officers and placed before the authority for prompt decision. The detention order was thus upheld, while further custody was treated as impermissible and release was directed if the detenu was not otherwise required. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196979 Unexplained delay in forwarding a detenu's representation can breach Article 22(5) where the jail authority fails to transmit it promptly; the original detention order remains valid, but continued detention becomes illegal. The text also notes that independent consideration by the detaining authority was not disproved on the materials, because the representation was processed through officers and placed before the authority for prompt decision. The detention order was thus upheld, while further custody was treated as impermissible and release was directed if the detenu was not otherwise required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196979