https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196978 The court refrained from addressing conflicting claims regarding preventive detention at the pre-execution stage dating back to 1991. The Appellant was directed to appear for the order to be served after over 15 years, with instructions for the Respondents not to take coercive steps for 10 days post-service. The court condoned the delay in filing the application, restored the appeal, and directed the service of the order on a specified date. The Appellant was advised to utilize available remedies. The appeal and related application were disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:03:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196978 The court refrained from addressing conflicting claims regarding preventive detention at the pre-execution stage dating back to 1991. The Appellant was directed to appear for the order to be served after over 15 years, with instructions for the Respondents not to take coercive steps for 10 days post-service. The court condoned the delay in filing the application, restored the appeal, and directed the service of the order on a specified date. The Appellant was advised to utilize available remedies. The appeal and related application were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196978