https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196970 At the Section 11 stage under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court held that reference to arbitration may be refused only where the claim is demonstrably dead, time-barred, or outside the arbitration agreement. Because a subsisting arbitration clause existed and the parties' rival assertions on breach, continuing rights, and alleged extinction of the claim raised factual disputes, the matter was held fit for arbitration. Jurisdictional and validity objections were treated as issues for the arbitral tribunal under Section 16. The petition was therefore maintained, the dispute was referred to arbitration, and a sole arbitrator was appointed. en-us Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:52:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196970 At the Section 11 stage under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court held that reference to arbitration may be refused only where the claim is demonstrably dead, time-barred, or outside the arbitration agreement. Because a subsisting arbitration clause existed and the parties' rival assertions on breach, continuing rights, and alleged extinction of the claim raised factual disputes, the matter was held fit for arbitration. Jurisdictional and validity objections were treated as issues for the arbitral tribunal under Section 16. The petition was therefore maintained, the dispute was referred to arbitration, and a sole arbitrator was appointed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196970