<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 261 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196969</link>
    <description>An order permitting unconditional withdrawal of a special leave petition cannot be treated as a dismissal unless the order itself expressly so states or otherwise records rejection on merits. Because withdrawal without adjudication does not amount to a decision on the merits, it does not attract res judicata and cannot, by itself, justify refusal of a later writ petition under Article 226. The High Court therefore erred in declining relief solely on the ground of such withdrawal, and the writ petition had to be considered on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 261 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196969</link>
      <description>An order permitting unconditional withdrawal of a special leave petition cannot be treated as a dismissal unless the order itself expressly so states or otherwise records rejection on merits. Because withdrawal without adjudication does not amount to a decision on the merits, it does not attract res judicata and cannot, by itself, justify refusal of a later writ petition under Article 226. The High Court therefore erred in declining relief solely on the ground of such withdrawal, and the writ petition had to be considered on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>