<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1003 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal on the issues of depreciation on leased assets and double taxation of Rs. 88.54 lakhs. However, it upheld the Revenue&#039;s stance on treating notional gain from securitization of lease receivables as taxable. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1003 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal on the issues of depreciation on leased assets and double taxation of Rs. 88.54 lakhs. However, it upheld the Revenue&#039;s stance on treating notional gain from securitization of lease receivables as taxable. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income under section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>