<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 992 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352723</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the AO/TPO to recompute the margin and allow the disallowances related to TDS and provident fund recoverable write-offs. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding the transfer pricing adjustments, exclusion of certain comparables, and the treatment of write-offs as bad debts or trading losses. The issues of violation of principles of natural justice, assessment of a non-existing amalgamating entity, prejudicial directions by the DRP, initiation of penalty proceedings, and levy of consequential interest were either considered general or premature and did not require specific adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:45:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 992 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352723</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions for the AO/TPO to recompute the margin and allow the disallowances related to TDS and provident fund recoverable write-offs. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer regarding the transfer pricing adjustments, exclusion of certain comparables, and the treatment of write-offs as bad debts or trading losses. The issues of violation of principles of natural justice, assessment of a non-existing amalgamating entity, prejudicial directions by the DRP, initiation of penalty proceedings, and levy of consequential interest were either considered general or premature and did not require specific adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>