<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 990 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352721</link>
    <description>Under the block of assets regime, depreciation was held allowable on Gurgaon unit assets transferred for use in other units because ownership was undisputed and inactivity of one unit did not by itself defeat business use. Electrical installations were treated as integral to manufacturing machinery, so the higher depreciation rate as plant and machinery was upheld. The deletion of additions and disallowances for electricity expenses, alleged stock suppression, gross profit, ESI payment, bad debts, freight and cartage, and club subscription was also sustained because the books were maintained, the explanations were accepted, and no specific defect or contrary evidence justified ad hoc disallowances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:45:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 990 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352721</link>
      <description>Under the block of assets regime, depreciation was held allowable on Gurgaon unit assets transferred for use in other units because ownership was undisputed and inactivity of one unit did not by itself defeat business use. Electrical installations were treated as integral to manufacturing machinery, so the higher depreciation rate as plant and machinery was upheld. The deletion of additions and disallowances for electricity expenses, alleged stock suppression, gross profit, ESI payment, bad debts, freight and cartage, and club subscription was also sustained because the books were maintained, the explanations were accepted, and no specific defect or contrary evidence justified ad hoc disallowances. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>