<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 982 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352713</link>
    <description>Interim relief was considered unavailable where entitlement to import depended on a final determination whether the goods fell within Schedule C of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013, including Methyl Ethyl Ketone preparations. The clause 11 requirement of a No Objection Certificate operated as a pre-condition for import of controlled substances in Schedule C, so the Court declined to direct issuance of such certificates at the interim stage. Relief seeking clarification that no No Objection Certificate was required for past imports was also found unsuitable for interim grant and was left for final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 08:44:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 982 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352713</link>
      <description>Interim relief was considered unavailable where entitlement to import depended on a final determination whether the goods fell within Schedule C of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Regulation of Controlled Substances) Order, 2013, including Methyl Ethyl Ketone preparations. The clause 11 requirement of a No Objection Certificate operated as a pre-condition for import of controlled substances in Schedule C, so the Court declined to direct issuance of such certificates at the interim stage. Relief seeking clarification that no No Objection Certificate was required for past imports was also found unsuitable for interim grant and was left for final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>