<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 969 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352700</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the entire show cause notice proposing the levy of service tax and directing a fresh notice without considering the limitation issue. The Court directed that the surviving demands in the original notice should be adjudicated, considering any contentions raised by the respondent in their reply. The appeal was disposed of with this modification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 969 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352700</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside the entire show cause notice proposing the levy of service tax and directing a fresh notice without considering the limitation issue. The Court directed that the surviving demands in the original notice should be adjudicated, considering any contentions raised by the respondent in their reply. The appeal was disposed of with this modification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>