<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 7 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11032</link>
    <description>Contribution of a partner&#039;s own capital asset to a partnership firm amounts to a transfer because the partner&#039;s exclusive ownership is reduced to a shared partnership interest. However, the consideration for that transfer is not merely the credit in the partner&#039;s capital account; it is the composite right to share profits and to receive a share in the net assets on dissolution or retirement. Because that consideration cannot be reliably valued at the time of contribution, adequacy of consideration is not ascertainable in praesenti. Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 therefore could not be invoked, and no deemed gift arose from the transfer of the building to the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 7 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11032</link>
      <description>Contribution of a partner&#039;s own capital asset to a partnership firm amounts to a transfer because the partner&#039;s exclusive ownership is reduced to a shared partnership interest. However, the consideration for that transfer is not merely the credit in the partner&#039;s capital account; it is the composite right to share profits and to receive a share in the net assets on dissolution or retirement. Because that consideration cannot be reliably valued at the time of contribution, adequacy of consideration is not ascertainable in praesenti. Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 therefore could not be invoked, and no deemed gift arose from the transfer of the building to the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>