<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 51 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11031</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing deductions for gratuity premium under section 40A(7)(b) despite section 43B. However, the High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing deductions for ESI contributions made after the due date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 51 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11031</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing deductions for gratuity premium under section 40A(7)(b) despite section 43B. However, the High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing deductions for ESI contributions made after the due date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>