https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352680 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, finding the demand based on alleged clandestine removal unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence. Penalties imposed on the assessee and partners were set aside, except for the uncontested demand of Rs. 49,437/- with interest. The judgment highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence in such cases, in line with established legal precedents. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352680 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, finding the demand based on alleged clandestine removal unsustainable due to lack of concrete evidence. Penalties imposed on the assessee and partners were set aside, except for the uncontested demand of Rs. 49,437/- with interest. The judgment highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence in such cases, in line with established legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352680