<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1308 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the nexus between input services and output services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the partial refund allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the precedent set by previous Tribunal orders and the clear connection between the immovable property service and the provision of output services by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 23:18:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1308 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the nexus between input services and output services, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the partial refund allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the precedent set by previous Tribunal orders and the clear connection between the immovable property service and the provision of output services by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>