<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 35 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11027</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the challenge by a private limited company against a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reassessment. The court held that the appellant had statutory remedies available and emphasized the need to exhaust alternative remedies before resorting to writ petitions. The court found that the grounds raised did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The appellant&#039;s writ petitions were deemed not maintainable as objections had already been filed. The court dismissed the special appeals and rejected the stay applications, without awarding any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 35 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11027</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the challenge by a private limited company against a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reassessment. The court held that the appellant had statutory remedies available and emphasized the need to exhaust alternative remedies before resorting to writ petitions. The court found that the grounds raised did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The appellant&#039;s writ petitions were deemed not maintainable as objections had already been filed. The court dismissed the special appeals and rejected the stay applications, without awarding any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>