https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196938 The mark 'OSSO' was found deceptively similar to 'ESSCO' because the goods were identical, the relevant purchasers were ordinary users including illiterate buyers, and the comparison of phonetic, visual and structural features showed substantial appropriation of the registered mark. The difference in the opening vowel was held insufficient to avoid confusion. The dishonest adoption of the mark supported a finding of infringement and also constituted disobedience of the compromise decree that restrained use of any deceptively similar mark for sanitary and bathroom fittings. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196938 The mark 'OSSO' was found deceptively similar to 'ESSCO' because the goods were identical, the relevant purchasers were ordinary users including illiterate buyers, and the comparison of phonetic, visual and structural features showed substantial appropriation of the registered mark. The difference in the opening vowel was held insufficient to avoid confusion. The dishonest adoption of the mark supported a finding of infringement and also constituted disobedience of the compromise decree that restrained use of any deceptively similar mark for sanitary and bathroom fittings. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196938