<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 313 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196937</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Notice of Motion in a case involving passing off and copyright infringement. The plaintiffs, manufacturers of spirituous liquors, alleged that the defendants&#039; products were deceptively similar, infringing on their trade marks and bottle labels. The defendants argued that the terms used were descriptive and lacked distinctiveness. The court found the terms descriptive, not distinctive, and lacking evidence of confusion or deception among consumers. It emphasized the importance of evidence and concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish a case for interim relief, dismissing the motion and imposing costs on the plaintiffs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 313 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196937</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Notice of Motion in a case involving passing off and copyright infringement. The plaintiffs, manufacturers of spirituous liquors, alleged that the defendants&#039; products were deceptively similar, infringing on their trade marks and bottle labels. The defendants argued that the terms used were descriptive and lacked distinctiveness. The court found the terms descriptive, not distinctive, and lacking evidence of confusion or deception among consumers. It emphasized the importance of evidence and concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish a case for interim relief, dismissing the motion and imposing costs on the plaintiffs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>