https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196928 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC where, on the plaint and annexed documents alone, it does not disclose a real cause of action. In allegations of fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or misuse of authority, the pleadings must state the material facts and necessary particulars showing how the wrongdoing occurred; bare labels are insufficient. Where the plaint relies on admitted execution of a power of attorney and sale deed but does not plead cancellation of authority before the sale or give concrete details of misuse, vague assertions cannot be saved by proposed evidence. On this reasoning, the plaint was held liable to rejection and the suit dismissal was upheld. en-us Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:45:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196928 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC where, on the plaint and annexed documents alone, it does not disclose a real cause of action. In allegations of fraud, collusion, misrepresentation, or misuse of authority, the pleadings must state the material facts and necessary particulars showing how the wrongdoing occurred; bare labels are insufficient. Where the plaint relies on admitted execution of a power of attorney and sale deed but does not plead cancellation of authority before the sale or give concrete details of misuse, vague assertions cannot be saved by proposed evidence. On this reasoning, the plaint was held liable to rejection and the suit dismissal was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196928