<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 935 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision in favor of the media broadcasting company, ruling that payments for broadcasting services were not subject to tax deduction under section 194J but fell under section 194C. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of accurately interpreting tax provisions based on the nature of services provided. The demand for additional tax deduction against the assessee was deemed unjustified, and the decision in favor of the company was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 935 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision in favor of the media broadcasting company, ruling that payments for broadcasting services were not subject to tax deduction under section 194J but fell under section 194C. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of accurately interpreting tax provisions based on the nature of services provided. The demand for additional tax deduction against the assessee was deemed unjustified, and the decision in favor of the company was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>