https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196915 Allegations that newspaper publications and commentaries were intended to prejudice a pending company dispute were held insufficient, on the materials placed, to justify exercise of criminal contempt jurisdiction. The Board considered the claimed influence on the public and the adjudicatory process, but found no adequate basis on the facts presented to initiate contempt proceedings. The request for contempt action was therefore rejected, leaving the applicants to pursue any other remedy available before the appropriate forum. en-us Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:04:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196915 Allegations that newspaper publications and commentaries were intended to prejudice a pending company dispute were held insufficient, on the materials placed, to justify exercise of criminal contempt jurisdiction. The Board considered the claimed influence on the public and the adjudicatory process, but found no adequate basis on the facts presented to initiate contempt proceedings. The request for contempt action was therefore rejected, leaving the applicants to pursue any other remedy available before the appropriate forum. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196915