<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1339 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting some additions and penalties while upholding others. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of certain transactions, leading to the deletion of some additions. However, penalties were upheld for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income on certain amounts, with directions given to the Assessing Officer to re-compute the penalty accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:06:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1339 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, deleting some additions and penalties while upholding others. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of certain transactions, leading to the deletion of some additions. However, penalties were upheld for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income on certain amounts, with directions given to the Assessing Officer to re-compute the penalty accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>