https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196909 The court upheld the constitutionality of the petitioner's arrest under Section 13 of the Central Excise Act, stating that Central Excise Officers have the power to arrest without a warrant to prevent duty evasion. The proceedings in C.O. No. 1 of 2009 were deemed valid as they were based on an ongoing investigation. The order directing the petitioner to authenticate printouts from a seized laptop was upheld, except for the provision threatening bail bond cancellation, which was quashed. The court allowed the application in part, maintaining most decisions but rejecting the bail bond cancellation threat. en-us Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:06:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196909 The court upheld the constitutionality of the petitioner's arrest under Section 13 of the Central Excise Act, stating that Central Excise Officers have the power to arrest without a warrant to prevent duty evasion. The proceedings in C.O. No. 1 of 2009 were deemed valid as they were based on an ongoing investigation. The order directing the petitioner to authenticate printouts from a seized laptop was upheld, except for the provision threatening bail bond cancellation, which was quashed. The court allowed the application in part, maintaining most decisions but rejecting the bail bond cancellation threat. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196909