<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 933 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352664</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the Income Tax Appeal of an organization seeking registration as a charitable institution under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. Concerns were raised about the organization potentially operating as a profitable entity under the guise of charity, as its utilization of funds for charitable activities did not align with its avowed objective of promoting the interests of non-resident Keralites. Despite technically falling within the scope of advancing general public utility, the organization failed to demonstrate substantial utilization of income for charitable purposes, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 933 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352664</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the Income Tax Appeal of an organization seeking registration as a charitable institution under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. Concerns were raised about the organization potentially operating as a profitable entity under the guise of charity, as its utilization of funds for charitable activities did not align with its avowed objective of promoting the interests of non-resident Keralites. Despite technically falling within the scope of advancing general public utility, the organization failed to demonstrate substantial utilization of income for charitable purposes, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>