https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352657 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition for expenditure on earth filling, emphasizing the verification of bank statements during remand proceedings. Regarding the addition of Sundry Creditors, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO for reevaluation due to lack of consideration of additional evidence. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and Cross Objection, while allowing the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, showcasing a detailed analysis of facts and legal arguments leading to a just decision. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:50:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352657 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition for expenditure on earth filling, emphasizing the verification of bank statements during remand proceedings. Regarding the addition of Sundry Creditors, the Tribunal remanded the issue back to the AO for reevaluation due to lack of consideration of additional evidence. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and Cross Objection, while allowing the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, showcasing a detailed analysis of facts and legal arguments leading to a just decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352657