<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 919 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352650</link>
    <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the entire issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration to determine the nature of services rendered by the non-resident agent and the tax liability on the commission payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:50:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 919 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352650</link>
      <description>The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, and the entire issue was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration to determine the nature of services rendered by the non-resident agent and the tax liability on the commission payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>