<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11017</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the hiring charges for furniture at a purportedly concessional rate could not be considered taxable under section 17(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court directed the issuance of a writ in line with the petition&#039;s prayers, without imposing any costs. The interim order&#039;s undertaking was discharged, and parties were instructed to requisition a signed copy of the order for their records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11017</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, holding that the hiring charges for furniture at a purportedly concessional rate could not be considered taxable under section 17(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court directed the issuance of a writ in line with the petition&#039;s prayers, without imposing any costs. The interim order&#039;s undertaking was discharged, and parties were instructed to requisition a signed copy of the order for their records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>