https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352638 The ITAT Kolkata addressed the delay in filing the appeal, condoning it due to satisfactory reasons provided by the Assessee. The addition on account of labour charges as bogus expenses was upheld, as the Assessee failed to provide adequate evidence of genuine payments. The disallowance of labour charges was upheld, as the Assessee did not prove the genuineness of payments. The Tribunal found the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) valid, dismissing the appeal due to lack of substantiating evidence by the Assessee. en-us Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:50:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352638 The ITAT Kolkata addressed the delay in filing the appeal, condoning it due to satisfactory reasons provided by the Assessee. The addition on account of labour charges as bogus expenses was upheld, as the Assessee failed to provide adequate evidence of genuine payments. The disallowance of labour charges was upheld, as the Assessee did not prove the genuineness of payments. The Tribunal found the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) valid, dismissing the appeal due to lack of substantiating evidence by the Assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352638