https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352631 The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Department's right to recover outstanding dues based on the Tribunal's order. The petitioner's failure to comply with the pre-deposit condition led to the lifting of the stay for all appellants, including the petitioner. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had benefited from the order and could not avoid recovery based on the company's non-compliance. Criticizing the Tribunal's order after enjoying its benefits was deemed impermissible. The Court distinguished a previous judgment, stating it addressed a different legal context. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352631 The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Department's right to recover outstanding dues based on the Tribunal's order. The petitioner's failure to comply with the pre-deposit condition led to the lifting of the stay for all appellants, including the petitioner. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had benefited from the order and could not avoid recovery based on the company's non-compliance. Criticizing the Tribunal's order after enjoying its benefits was deemed impermissible. The Court distinguished a previous judgment, stating it addressed a different legal context. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352631