<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 896 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification based on evidence to be submitted by the appellant regarding processing of returned goods before sale. The appellant must demonstrate that goods underwent further processing to apply duty under transaction value, emphasizing the importance of providing evidence to support claims under Central Excise rules and the need for clear documentation to establish compliance with duty payment regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:49:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 896 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification based on evidence to be submitted by the appellant regarding processing of returned goods before sale. The appellant must demonstrate that goods underwent further processing to apply duty under transaction value, emphasizing the importance of providing evidence to support claims under Central Excise rules and the need for clear documentation to establish compliance with duty payment regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>