<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 883 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352614</link>
    <description>ITAT, Kolkata set aside imposition of penalty under s.271(1)(c), holding the show-cause notice issued under s.274 defective for failing to specify whether the charge was concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Because the notice did not remove inappropriate wording and thus did not enable the assessee to know the precise accusation or be heard effectively, the penalty could not be sustained. Penalty directed to be cancelled; decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 883 - ITAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352614</link>
      <description>ITAT, Kolkata set aside imposition of penalty under s.271(1)(c), holding the show-cause notice issued under s.274 defective for failing to specify whether the charge was concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Because the notice did not remove inappropriate wording and thus did not enable the assessee to know the precise accusation or be heard effectively, the penalty could not be sustained. Penalty directed to be cancelled; decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>