https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196901 The constitutional scheme protects judicial independence by confining removal of a High Court Judge to impeachment under Article 124(4) and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. Bar Councils and Bar Associations have no authority to pass resolutions or use collective pressure to compel a sitting Judge to resign on allegations touching judicial conduct, and such conduct may also raise contempt concerns. Complaints against a High Court Judge should be routed through an in-house procedure to the Chief Justice of the High Court, with consultation of the Chief Justice of India where appropriate; complaints against a Chief Justice of a High Court should be taken directly to the Chief Justice of India. en-us Tue, 05 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:40:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196901 The constitutional scheme protects judicial independence by confining removal of a High Court Judge to impeachment under Article 124(4) and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. Bar Councils and Bar Associations have no authority to pass resolutions or use collective pressure to compel a sitting Judge to resign on allegations touching judicial conduct, and such conduct may also raise contempt concerns. Complaints against a High Court Judge should be routed through an in-house procedure to the Chief Justice of the High Court, with consultation of the Chief Justice of India where appropriate; complaints against a Chief Justice of a High Court should be taken directly to the Chief Justice of India. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196901