https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196897 The court directed the deletion of the Central Information Commission (CIC) as a respondent, emphasizing that a judicial or quasi-judicial body challenged should not be impleaded unless malafides are alleged. The UPSC was directed to disclose information requested under the RTI Act, except for specific marks. The court upheld the disclosure, noting that concerns about exam integrity were unfounded as the scaling methodology had been disclosed. It dismissed concerns about coaching institutes manipulating exams, stating the preliminary exam is a screening test, and upheld the order for disclosure, dismissing the appeal and vacating the stay order. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:54:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196897 The court directed the deletion of the Central Information Commission (CIC) as a respondent, emphasizing that a judicial or quasi-judicial body challenged should not be impleaded unless malafides are alleged. The UPSC was directed to disclose information requested under the RTI Act, except for specific marks. The court upheld the disclosure, noting that concerns about exam integrity were unfounded as the scaling methodology had been disclosed. It dismissed concerns about coaching institutes manipulating exams, stating the preliminary exam is a screening test, and upheld the order for disclosure, dismissing the appeal and vacating the stay order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196897