<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 32 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11010</link>
    <description>The court considered the challenge against notices issued under section 147 of the Income-tax Act to reopen assessments for the years 1982-83 and 1983-84. It was found that there was no failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, as all relevant figures were disclosed in the returns and balance-sheets. The court held that the notices issued beyond the four-year limitation period were without jurisdiction. Therefore, the court quashed and set aside the notices, ruling in favor of the petitioner with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 32 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11010</link>
      <description>The court considered the challenge against notices issued under section 147 of the Income-tax Act to reopen assessments for the years 1982-83 and 1983-84. It was found that there was no failure to disclose material facts by the assessee, as all relevant figures were disclosed in the returns and balance-sheets. The court held that the notices issued beyond the four-year limitation period were without jurisdiction. Therefore, the court quashed and set aside the notices, ruling in favor of the petitioner with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>