https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892 A challenge to a court sale under Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires proof of material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale, together with substantial injury. A mere plea that the property was not saleable, without such pleadings or proof, cannot sustain setting aside the sale, and the judgment-debtor cannot use that provision to raise a ground outside its scope. The note also states that a revision may lie against a subordinate court order in appellate jurisdiction where no appeal is provided. On that basis, the executing court's rejection was restored and the sale upheld. en-us Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892 A challenge to a court sale under Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure requires proof of material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale, together with substantial injury. A mere plea that the property was not saleable, without such pleadings or proof, cannot sustain setting aside the sale, and the judgment-debtor cannot use that provision to raise a ground outside its scope. The note also states that a revision may lie against a subordinate court order in appellate jurisdiction where no appeal is provided. On that basis, the executing court's rejection was restored and the sale upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892