<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892</link>
    <description>Order 21 Rule 90 CPC permits a court sale to be set aside only where material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale, together with resulting substantial injury, is established. An objection that the property lacked saleable interest falls outside that rule and cannot by itself invalidate the sale, particularly where the ground could have been raised earlier; constructive res judicata may bar such belated objections. The executing court&#039;s rejection of the sale challenge was restored. A revision under Section 115 CPC remains maintainable against a non-appealable order of a subordinate court exercising appellate jurisdiction. The High Court&#039;s contrary order was set aside, upholding the court sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892</link>
      <description>Order 21 Rule 90 CPC permits a court sale to be set aside only where material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale, together with resulting substantial injury, is established. An objection that the property lacked saleable interest falls outside that rule and cannot by itself invalidate the sale, particularly where the ground could have been raised earlier; constructive res judicata may bar such belated objections. The executing court&#039;s rejection of the sale challenge was restored. A revision under Section 115 CPC remains maintainable against a non-appealable order of a subordinate court exercising appellate jurisdiction. The High Court&#039;s contrary order was set aside, upholding the court sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>