<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1338 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine payments for collaborative projects. The Tribunal reversed the disallowance under Section 80M, finding it ad hoc without substantial evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal overturned the adjustment under transfer pricing provisions, noting previous decisions in favor of the assessee and lack of challenge by the AO. The judgment was pronounced on January 8, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1338 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine payments for collaborative projects. The Tribunal reversed the disallowance under Section 80M, finding it ad hoc without substantial evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal overturned the adjustment under transfer pricing provisions, noting previous decisions in favor of the assessee and lack of challenge by the AO. The judgment was pronounced on January 8, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>