<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price adjustment based on a revised list of comparables. The issues regarding inappropriate comparables were addressed, while other grounds such as interest charges and penalty proceedings were deemed either consequential or premature. The order was pronounced on 23rd June, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1267 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO/TPO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price adjustment based on a revised list of comparables. The issues regarding inappropriate comparables were addressed, while other grounds such as interest charges and penalty proceedings were deemed either consequential or premature. The order was pronounced on 23rd June, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>