<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 874 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352605</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation on CCTV cameras and control access systems, considering them as peripherals of computer systems. It partially disallowed miscellaneous expenditure, restricting the disallowance to 25% of the remaining amount. The expenditure relating to the purchase of know-how was allowed as normal business expenses. Disallowance under section 14A of the Act was limited to 5% of dividend income for both relevant assessment years. The disallowance of repair expenses was rejected, and relief was granted in respect of miscellaneous expenditure. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 874 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352605</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for higher depreciation on CCTV cameras and control access systems, considering them as peripherals of computer systems. It partially disallowed miscellaneous expenditure, restricting the disallowance to 25% of the remaining amount. The expenditure relating to the purchase of know-how was allowed as normal business expenses. Disallowance under section 14A of the Act was limited to 5% of dividend income for both relevant assessment years. The disallowance of repair expenses was rejected, and relief was granted in respect of miscellaneous expenditure. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>