<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 869 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deductions claimed by the BPO service provider, including foreign exchange gain and unpaid bonus, stating they were valid and necessary to avoid double taxation. It found the AO&#039;s selective acceptance of deductions unsustainable, emphasizing that genuine claims should be honored. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow the deductions under section 10A of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 869 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deductions claimed by the BPO service provider, including foreign exchange gain and unpaid bonus, stating they were valid and necessary to avoid double taxation. It found the AO&#039;s selective acceptance of deductions unsustainable, emphasizing that genuine claims should be honored. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow the deductions under section 10A of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>