<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1665 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196863</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s payment to National Trading Co. was deemed allowable as office expenses, salary, and maintenance charges not subject to TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the payee&#039;s tax compliance. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s deduction for routine business expenditure on petty expenses, overturning the disallowance by the CIT(A). The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the disallowance of the balance amount was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1665 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196863</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant&#039;s payment to National Trading Co. was deemed allowable as office expenses, salary, and maintenance charges not subject to TDS under section 194C. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the payee&#039;s tax compliance. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s deduction for routine business expenditure on petty expenses, overturning the disallowance by the CIT(A). The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the disallowance of the balance amount was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>