<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1500 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196864</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the appellate court held that the cheque transaction and liability could not be properly assessed because material witnesses connected with the transaction were not examined. The complainant relied on a cheque issued toward a claimed debt, while the defence asserted that the cheque related to a different transaction involving another person. As the existing record did not permit effective adjudication on the disputed factual foundation, the acquittal was set aside and the matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration with liberty to adduce further evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1500 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196864</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act, the appellate court held that the cheque transaction and liability could not be properly assessed because material witnesses connected with the transaction were not examined. The complainant relied on a cheque issued toward a claimed debt, while the defence asserted that the cheque related to a different transaction involving another person. As the existing record did not permit effective adjudication on the disputed factual foundation, the acquittal was set aside and the matter was remanded to the trial court for fresh consideration with liberty to adduce further evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>