<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1287 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196865</link>
    <description>A complaint seeking vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must specifically aver that the accused was, at the relevant time, in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business; bare status as a partner or general allegations are insufficient, so proceedings under Section 138 and the summoning order were unsustainable against the petitioners. The text also states that Section 138 prosecutions are triable summarily under Section 143, so Section 245(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply, and rejection of that application was upheld. On maintainability, the earlier withdrawal of a connected petition did not bar the present proceeding because it was already pending and the reliefs were not identical.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:49:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1287 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196865</link>
      <description>A complaint seeking vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must specifically aver that the accused was, at the relevant time, in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business; bare status as a partner or general allegations are insufficient, so proceedings under Section 138 and the summoning order were unsustainable against the petitioners. The text also states that Section 138 prosecutions are triable summarily under Section 143, so Section 245(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply, and rejection of that application was upheld. On maintainability, the earlier withdrawal of a connected petition did not bar the present proceeding because it was already pending and the reliefs were not identical.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>