https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10999 The High Court quashed the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax's order regarding the release of seized jewellery, citing errors in assessing evidence and non-compliance with court directives. Respondent No. 2's failure to consider petitioner's documents led to a miscarriage of justice, prompting the Court to remand the case for a fresh decision in accordance with its directions, emphasizing the necessity of a comprehensive review of evidence in legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10999 The High Court quashed the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax's order regarding the release of seized jewellery, citing errors in assessing evidence and non-compliance with court directives. Respondent No. 2's failure to consider petitioner's documents led to a miscarriage of justice, prompting the Court to remand the case for a fresh decision in accordance with its directions, emphasizing the necessity of a comprehensive review of evidence in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10999